![]() The filing of criminal charges against Webe Web is at least the second federal criminal case brought against operators of Web sites featuring minors in provocative poses. Some are posed with facial expressions and in positions that suggest a willingness to engage in sexual activity.”įoley resigned from Congress in September after it was reported that he exchanged inappropriate e-mails with a teenage page. “The children are dressed in underwear, adult lingerie, high heels, etc., and placed in sexually suggestive poses which focus the viewer's attention on the genital or pubic area. “There are no semi-nude or nude images,” she said. No nudity, but ‘sexually suggestive poses’ In an e-mail interview, Martin told that prosecutors will press charges against the defendants for photos showing the young girls scantily clothed but not nude under a federal statute that deems images that “show lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area” to be child pornography. “Here lewd has met lucrative, and exploitation of a child’s innocence equals profits.” Martin said in a statement announcing the indictments and the closure of all the Webe Web sites. “The images charged are not legitimate child modeling, but rather lascivious poses one would expect to see in an adult magazine,” U.S. Authorities said Pierson is cooperating with prosecutors. While it's certainly possible you won't get your head bitten off, it's not a risk most sane people would want to take.Photographer Jeff Pierson of Brookwood, Ala., also was charged with two counts of using a computer to “transport child pornography in interstate commerce” from January 2003 through 2004. Think of it as being like sticking your head in an alligator's mouth. Under US statutes, child pornography does not require nudity (and in fact does not require that the model is even a minor). I should also point out that in some contexts (and in the view of some law enforcement agencies) it may well BE illegal, depending on the nature of the images.Īlso, what may be considered art or acceptable photography in Europe may be considered child pornography in the USA. In other words just because it may not actually be illegal if done in the right context, doesn't mean you won't regret it. Sturges also defended himself through a series of talks and interviews." Sturges received more support from civil libertarians and artistic associations. Protestors picketed at major bookstores around the country which stocked his works. Later in the same year, his work came under attack by Christian conservatives led by Operation Rescue and Focus on the Family. Eventually Sturges got most of his work and equipment back. After over a year of investigation, the case was thrown out by a grand jury. The art world and naturist communities were enraged, and publicly defended him. ![]() In April 1990, FBI agents raided his studio, confiscating his equipment and his work, and alleged he was creating child pornography. As such, some critics have claimed that his work is child pornography disguised as fine art. ".Many of Sturges' works feature young girls and boys in the nude. However just ask Jock Sturges about the can of worms you may be opening. It's not always illegal to shoot pictures of them in swimwear, lingerie or even nude. I should point out that it's not illegal to shoot images of minors. Then after she signs you shoot tests for her through the agency. If you find a girl who is 5'10", 34-24-34 and freak'n amazing looking and turns out to be 15 you should be escorting the girl and her parents to the best agency you have connections with. It is one obvious difference between a pro photographer and a MWC. ![]() If you regularly present work featuring models who are outside accepted industry parameters you will develop zero credibility. As a pro, by default that's what shooting with you is.įrom a career point of view shooting minors is less the problem than shooting minors or would be models of any age, who are not competitive and are not going to work, who are not with a creditable agency already or ready to walk in and sign. Minors do not have the right to engage a person in a business enterprise. If you meet a potential client and they turn out to be underage you tell them it's been great meeting but any further communications must be initiated by their parents. Something akin to if I punch a guy and break his jaw, oops, if a pro kick boxer in the same location under the same circumstances punches a guy and breaks his jaw- it's assault with a deadly weapon. While everyone is handing out their two cents.Ī professional photographer simply can not shoot minors for fun like anyone else can.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |